Stay Informed
with these

Agri Marketing Update
e-newsletter sent each Monday and Thursday
Agri Marketing
Text Alerts

Big news as it breaks
@AgriMarketing on Twitter
Farm Show Guide
Marketing Services Guide

National Agri-Marketing Association
NAMA Website
Upcoming Events
Agri-Marketing Conf
Best of NAMA 2024

Rep. Victoria Spartz’s (R-IN-5th)

by C.J. Miller, Hoosier Ag Today radio network

The U.S. House has voted down Rep. Victoria Spartz's (R-IN-5th) amendment to the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2024 -- the legislation that funds the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) -- by a vote of 49 to 377.

Spartz's amendment stated that none of the funds made available by the bill may be used to carry out commodity checkoff programs. However, what made Spartz's amendment so puzzling to most in agriculture is that no federal funds are used in any of the commodity checkoff programs. All funds used are contributed by the producers of the commodity in question.

Many ag groups voiced their opposition to Spartz's amendment--including the American Soybean Association (ASA), Indiana Soybean Alliance (ISA), National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA), Indiana Beef Cattle Association (IBCA), Indiana Dairy Producers (IDP), National Associations of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), and National Council of Farmer Cooperatives (NCFC).

"Congresswoman Spartz took aim at the entire checkoff system with no regard to the votes of those of us farmers who, time and again, have voted to preserve these programs that allow us to collectively promote our crops, conduct research, develop and protect markets, and assure domestic and global access. I speak for the soy industry today when I say, we are exceptionally pleased this strange amendment was snuffed on the House floor," said Daryl Cates, President of the American Soybean Association.

Congressman Jim Baird (R-IN-4th), who is a fellow Hoosier Republican lawmaker and serves on the House Ag Committee, also spoke against Spartz's amendment.

"Checkoff programs function as research and promotion boards that help different commodities achieve industry success. This amendment proves factually unnecessary and inaccurate since no tax dollars are used to implement the checkoffs and no appropriated dollars are used to oversee them," said Baird.

After Spartz had filed the amendment over the summer, Spartz told Hoosier Ag Today says the ag checkoff programs lacked oversight and transparency after she had paid into a wheat checkoff program.

To read the entire report click here.

Search News & Articles

Proudly associated with:
SIIA AM&P Canadian Agri-food Marketers Alliance National Agri-Marketing Association
Agricultural Relations Council National Association of Farm Broadcasters Agricultural Communicators Network Livestock Publications Council
All content © 2024, Henderson Communications LLC. | User Agreement