CLICK HERE TO VIEW CURRENT ISSUE

Best of NAMA 2026

Stay Informed
with these

Services
Agri Marketing Update
e-newsletter sent each Monday and Thursday
@AgriMarketing on Twitter
Farm Show Guide
Marketing Services Guide
Books:

National Agri-Marketing Association
NAMA Website
Upcoming Events
Chapters
Agri-Marketing Conf
Best of NAMA 2025












ANTI-FARMING GROUPS URGE FAA TO REJECT RULE SHIELDING ANIMAL AGRIBUSINESS FROM DRONE OVERSIGHT
Source: FarmSTAND. Animal Outlook and We Animals news release

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Groups representing investigative, legal advocacy, and photojournalism efforts to fight factory farming have submitted formal comments to the Federal Aviation Administration opposing a proposed rule that could let large-scale factory farms and slaughterhouses obtain Unmanned Aircraft Flight Restrictions (UAFRs), effectively closing off the airspace above their facilities to drones.

The groups argue the proposed rule, FAA docket FAA-2026-4558, could hand the country's biggest and most polluting agricultural operations a tool to block the drone photography and video that has repeatedly exposed animal cruelty, environmental violations, and consumer fraud in the food system, without any evidence that drones pose a safety or security risk to these facilities.

Aerial footage has documented flooded manure lagoons after Hurricane Florence, mass culling operations during avian flu and swine flu outbreaks, feedlots holding well over 100,000 cattle, and egg farms falsely marketed as "free-roaming." In one case, aerial footage secured by Animal Outlook and We Animals helped win a class action settlement against an egg producer that misrepresented its hens' living conditions.

"The industrial animal agriculture system relies on policies that restrict free speech and make transparency impossible," said Kelsey Eberly, FarmSTAND Senior Staff Attorney. "Without the essential and constitutionally-protected work of drone photojournalists, we would lose critical information and context about how factory farms suck up precious land and water resources, pollute their surrounding communities, and deceive consumers about the conditions for animals in these facilities. Keeping the skies above massive feedlots and dairies open to responsible drone pilots is vital for holding these facilities accountable."

"Drones are one of the only ways the public can see what's actually happening behind the walls of industrial animal agriculture facilities," says Ben Williamson, Executive Director, Animal Outlook. "Allowing factory farms to obtain UAFRs would not protect anyone's safety. It would protect the industry's ability to hide conditions that consumers, regulators, and journalists have every right to see."

"Responsible drone journalism already operates under FAA rules without putting people, animals, or facilities at risk," says Victoria de Martigny, photojournalist and Director of Visual Content at We Animals. "Further restrictions on newsgathering would not improve safety. They would limit independent reporting on industrial animal agriculture and make it harder for the public to understand an industry that already works very hard to keep itself hidden."

The comments note that courts have consistently found a First Amendment right to film matters of public concern, and a constitutionally protected interest in using drones for that purpose and that the FAA's own proposal acknowledges that restricting airspace over facilities like factory farms curtails First Amendment activity. The groups argue the rule, if finalized as the agency proposes, could let large facilities silence critical coverage while permitting neutral or favorable drone activity like mapping or research, raising serious First Amendment concerns.

FarmSTAND, Animal Outlook, and We Animals are urging the FAA not to develop special approval requirements or restrictions for drone use for the food and agriculture sector at all, and if it does, to explicitly exempt First Amendment newsgathering activity from any UAFR restrictions.

The full comments are available here and at Regulations.gov under Docket ID FAA-2026-4558.

About FarmSTAND

FarmSTAND is the only legal advocacy organization in the country dedicated solely to taking on all industrial animal agriculture. It is focused on dismantling the structures that enable the consolidation of corporate power and extractive practices in our food system and supports a vision of animal agriculture that is regenerative, humane, and owned by independent farmers. https://farmstand.org/

About Animal Outlook

Animal Outlook is a nonprofit animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals through undercover investigations, litigation, corporate outreach, public education, and other advocacy programs. http://animaloutlook.org

About We Animals

We Animals is an international nonprofit that advocates for animals through photojournalism, working with a global network of photographers and videographers to document the treatment of farmed, wild, and other exploited animals and equip advocates and media outlets with the imagery needed to drive change. https://weanimals.org


Search News & Articles










Proudly associated with:
Ag Media Council Canadian Agri-food Marketers Alliance National Agri-Marketing Association National Association of Farm Broadcasters
Agricultural Relations Council Agricultural Communicators Network Livestock Publications Council
All content © 2026, Henderson Communications LLC. | User Agreement