 |
| CLICK HERE TO VIEW CURRENT ISSUE |
 |
| Best of NAMA 2025 |
|
 |
|
CATTLEMEN "DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED" IN USDA'S MANDATORY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING FINAL RULE
May 24, 2013
Source: National Cattlemen's Beef Association news release
The following is a statement from National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) President Scott George, a Cody, Wyo. dairy and cattle producer, regarding today's announcement that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a final rule regarding the Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling Rule (MCOOL).
"We are deeply disappointed with this short-sighted action by the USDA. Our largest trading partners have already said that these provisions will not bring the United States into compliance with our WTO obligations and will result in increased discrimination against imported products and in turn retaliatory tariffs or other authorized trade sanctions.
As we said in comments submitted to USDA, 'any retaliation against U.S. beef would be devastating for our producers.' While trying to make an untenable mandate fit with our international trade obligations, USDA chose to set up U.S. cattle producers for financial losses.
Moreover, this rule will place a greater record-keeping burden on producers, feeders and processors through the born, raised and harvested label."
"As cattlemen and women, we do not oppose voluntary labeling as a marketing tool to distinguish product and add value. However, USDA is not the entity that we want marketing beef, and on its face, a label that says 'harvested' is unappealing to both consumers and cattle producers."
|
|
|
|
|
